mirror of
https://github.com/awatertrevi/infisical.git
synced 2026-10-15 15:41:27 +00:00
Merge pull request #3057 from akhilmhdh/fix/permission-scope
Permission boundary check
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ import slugify from "@sindresorhus/slugify";
|
||||
|
||||
import { OrgMembershipRole, TOrgRoles } from "@app/db/schemas";
|
||||
import { TOidcConfigDALFactory } from "@app/ee/services/oidc/oidc-config-dal";
|
||||
import { isAtLeastAsPrivileged } from "@app/lib/casl";
|
||||
import { validatePermissionBoundary } from "@app/lib/casl/boundary";
|
||||
import { BadRequestError, ForbiddenRequestError, NotFoundError, UnauthorizedError } from "@app/lib/errors";
|
||||
import { alphaNumericNanoId } from "@app/lib/nanoid";
|
||||
import { TGroupProjectDALFactory } from "@app/services/group-project/group-project-dal";
|
||||
@@ -87,9 +87,14 @@ export const groupServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
actorOrgId
|
||||
);
|
||||
const isCustomRole = Boolean(customRole);
|
||||
const hasRequiredPriviledges = isAtLeastAsPrivileged(permission, rolePermission);
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPriviledges)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to create a more privileged group" });
|
||||
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePermissionBoundary(permission, rolePermission);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to create a more privileged group",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const group = await groupDAL.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
||||
const existingGroup = await groupDAL.findOne({ orgId: actorOrgId, name }, tx);
|
||||
@@ -156,9 +161,13 @@ export const groupServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const isCustomRole = Boolean(customOrgRole);
|
||||
const hasRequiredNewRolePermission = isAtLeastAsPrivileged(permission, rolePermission);
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredNewRolePermission)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to create a more privileged group" });
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePermissionBoundary(permission, rolePermission);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to update a more privileged group",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
if (isCustomRole) customRole = customOrgRole;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -329,9 +338,13 @@ export const groupServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
const { permission: groupRolePermission } = await permissionService.getOrgPermissionByRole(group.role, actorOrgId);
|
||||
|
||||
// check if user has broader or equal to privileges than group
|
||||
const hasRequiredPrivileges = isAtLeastAsPrivileged(permission, groupRolePermission);
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPrivileges)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to add user to more privileged group" });
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePermissionBoundary(permission, groupRolePermission);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to add user to more privileged group",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const user = await userDAL.findOne({ username });
|
||||
if (!user) throw new NotFoundError({ message: `Failed to find user with username ${username}` });
|
||||
@@ -396,9 +409,13 @@ export const groupServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
const { permission: groupRolePermission } = await permissionService.getOrgPermissionByRole(group.role, actorOrgId);
|
||||
|
||||
// check if user has broader or equal to privileges than group
|
||||
const hasRequiredPrivileges = isAtLeastAsPrivileged(permission, groupRolePermission);
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPrivileges)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to delete user from more privileged group" });
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePermissionBoundary(permission, groupRolePermission);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to delete user from more privileged group",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const user = await userDAL.findOne({ username });
|
||||
if (!user) throw new NotFoundError({ message: `Failed to find user with username ${username}` });
|
||||
|
||||
+22
-10
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ import { packRules } from "@casl/ability/extra";
|
||||
import ms from "ms";
|
||||
|
||||
import { ActionProjectType, TableName } from "@app/db/schemas";
|
||||
import { isAtLeastAsPrivileged } from "@app/lib/casl";
|
||||
import { validatePermissionBoundary } from "@app/lib/casl/boundary";
|
||||
import { BadRequestError, ForbiddenRequestError, NotFoundError } from "@app/lib/errors";
|
||||
import { unpackPermissions } from "@app/server/routes/sanitizedSchema/permission";
|
||||
import { ActorType } from "@app/services/auth/auth-type";
|
||||
@@ -79,9 +79,13 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeV2ServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
// we need to validate that the privilege given is not higher than the assigning users permission
|
||||
// @ts-expect-error this is expected error because of one being really accurate rule definition other being a bit more broader. Both are valid casl rules
|
||||
targetIdentityPermission.update(targetIdentityPermission.rules.concat(customPermission));
|
||||
const hasRequiredPriviledges = isAtLeastAsPrivileged(permission, targetIdentityPermission);
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPriviledges)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to update more privileged identity" });
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePermissionBoundary(permission, targetIdentityPermission);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to update more privileged identity",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const existingSlug = await identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeDAL.findOne({
|
||||
slug,
|
||||
@@ -161,9 +165,13 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeV2ServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
// we need to validate that the privilege given is not higher than the assigning users permission
|
||||
// @ts-expect-error this is expected error because of one being really accurate rule definition other being a bit more broader. Both are valid casl rules
|
||||
targetIdentityPermission.update(targetIdentityPermission.rules.concat(data.permissions || []));
|
||||
const hasRequiredPriviledges = isAtLeastAsPrivileged(permission, targetIdentityPermission);
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPriviledges)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to update more privileged identity" });
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePermissionBoundary(permission, targetIdentityPermission);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to update more privileged identity",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
if (data?.slug) {
|
||||
const existingSlug = await identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeDAL.findOne({
|
||||
@@ -239,9 +247,13 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeV2ServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
actorOrgId,
|
||||
actionProjectType: ActionProjectType.Any
|
||||
});
|
||||
const hasRequiredPriviledges = isAtLeastAsPrivileged(permission, identityRolePermission);
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPriviledges)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to update more privileged identity" });
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePermissionBoundary(permission, identityRolePermission);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to update more privileged identity",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const deletedPrivilege = await identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeDAL.deleteById(identityPrivilege.id);
|
||||
return {
|
||||
|
||||
+22
-10
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ import { PackRule, packRules, unpackRules } from "@casl/ability/extra";
|
||||
import ms from "ms";
|
||||
|
||||
import { ActionProjectType } from "@app/db/schemas";
|
||||
import { isAtLeastAsPrivileged } from "@app/lib/casl";
|
||||
import { validatePermissionBoundary } from "@app/lib/casl/boundary";
|
||||
import { BadRequestError, ForbiddenRequestError, NotFoundError } from "@app/lib/errors";
|
||||
import { UnpackedPermissionSchema } from "@app/server/routes/sanitizedSchema/permission";
|
||||
import { ActorType } from "@app/services/auth/auth-type";
|
||||
@@ -88,9 +88,13 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
// we need to validate that the privilege given is not higher than the assigning users permission
|
||||
// @ts-expect-error this is expected error because of one being really accurate rule definition other being a bit more broader. Both are valid casl rules
|
||||
targetIdentityPermission.update(targetIdentityPermission.rules.concat(customPermission));
|
||||
const hasRequiredPriviledges = isAtLeastAsPrivileged(permission, targetIdentityPermission);
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPriviledges)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to update more privileged identity" });
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePermissionBoundary(permission, targetIdentityPermission);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to update more privileged identity",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const existingSlug = await identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeDAL.findOne({
|
||||
slug,
|
||||
@@ -172,9 +176,13 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
// we need to validate that the privilege given is not higher than the assigning users permission
|
||||
// @ts-expect-error this is expected error because of one being really accurate rule definition other being a bit more broader. Both are valid casl rules
|
||||
targetIdentityPermission.update(targetIdentityPermission.rules.concat(data.permissions || []));
|
||||
const hasRequiredPriviledges = isAtLeastAsPrivileged(permission, targetIdentityPermission);
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPriviledges)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to update more privileged identity" });
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePermissionBoundary(permission, targetIdentityPermission);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to update more privileged identity",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const identityPrivilege = await identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeDAL.findOne({
|
||||
slug,
|
||||
@@ -268,9 +276,13 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
actorOrgId,
|
||||
actionProjectType: ActionProjectType.Any
|
||||
});
|
||||
const hasRequiredPriviledges = isAtLeastAsPrivileged(permission, identityRolePermission);
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPriviledges)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to edit more privileged identity" });
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePermissionBoundary(permission, identityRolePermission);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to edit more privileged identity",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const identityPrivilege = await identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeDAL.findOne({
|
||||
slug,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,22 +5,6 @@ import { PermissionConditionOperators } from "@app/lib/casl";
|
||||
|
||||
export const PermissionConditionSchema = {
|
||||
[PermissionConditionOperators.$IN]: z.string().trim().min(1).array(),
|
||||
[PermissionConditionOperators.$ALL]: z.string().trim().min(1).array(),
|
||||
[PermissionConditionOperators.$REGEX]: z
|
||||
.string()
|
||||
.min(1)
|
||||
.refine(
|
||||
(el) => {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
// eslint-disable-next-line no-new
|
||||
new RegExp(el);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
} catch {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{ message: "Invalid regex pattern" }
|
||||
),
|
||||
[PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
[PermissionConditionOperators.$NEQ]: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
[PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB]: z
|
||||
|
||||
+15
-7
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ import { PackRule, packRules, unpackRules } from "@casl/ability/extra";
|
||||
import ms from "ms";
|
||||
|
||||
import { ActionProjectType, TableName } from "@app/db/schemas";
|
||||
import { isAtLeastAsPrivileged } from "@app/lib/casl";
|
||||
import { validatePermissionBoundary } from "@app/lib/casl/boundary";
|
||||
import { BadRequestError, ForbiddenRequestError, NotFoundError } from "@app/lib/errors";
|
||||
import { UnpackedPermissionSchema } from "@app/server/routes/sanitizedSchema/permission";
|
||||
import { ActorType } from "@app/services/auth/auth-type";
|
||||
@@ -76,9 +76,13 @@ export const projectUserAdditionalPrivilegeServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
// we need to validate that the privilege given is not higher than the assigning users permission
|
||||
// @ts-expect-error this is expected error because of one being really accurate rule definition other being a bit more broader. Both are valid casl rules
|
||||
targetUserPermission.update(targetUserPermission.rules.concat(customPermission));
|
||||
const hasRequiredPriviledges = isAtLeastAsPrivileged(permission, targetUserPermission);
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPriviledges)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to update more privileged identity" });
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePermissionBoundary(permission, targetUserPermission);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to update more privileged user",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const existingSlug = await projectUserAdditionalPrivilegeDAL.findOne({
|
||||
slug,
|
||||
@@ -163,9 +167,13 @@ export const projectUserAdditionalPrivilegeServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
// we need to validate that the privilege given is not higher than the assigning users permission
|
||||
// @ts-expect-error this is expected error because of one being really accurate rule definition other being a bit more broader. Both are valid casl rules
|
||||
targetUserPermission.update(targetUserPermission.rules.concat(dto.permissions || []));
|
||||
const hasRequiredPriviledges = isAtLeastAsPrivileged(permission, targetUserPermission);
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPriviledges)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to update more privileged identity" });
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePermissionBoundary(permission, targetUserPermission);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to update more privileged identity",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
if (dto?.slug) {
|
||||
const existingSlug = await projectUserAdditionalPrivilegeDAL.findOne({
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user