mirror of
https://github.com/awatertrevi/infisical.git
synced 2026-10-14 21:51:56 +00:00
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into misc/privilege-management-v2-transition
This commit is contained in:
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
|
||||
"type:check": "tsc --noEmit",
|
||||
"lint:fix": "eslint --fix --ext js,ts ./src",
|
||||
"lint": "eslint 'src/**/*.ts'",
|
||||
"test:unit": "vitest run -c vitest.unit.config.ts",
|
||||
"test:e2e": "vitest run -c vitest.e2e.config.ts --bail=1",
|
||||
"test:e2e-watch": "vitest -c vitest.e2e.config.ts --bail=1",
|
||||
"test:e2e-coverage": "vitest run --coverage -c vitest.e2e.config.ts",
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -88,15 +88,18 @@ export const groupServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
);
|
||||
const isCustomRole = Boolean(customRole);
|
||||
|
||||
const hasRequiredPriviledges = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionGroupActions.ManagePrivileges,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Groups,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPriviledges)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to create a more privileged group" });
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to create a more privileged group",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const group = await groupDAL.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
||||
const existingGroup = await groupDAL.findOne({ orgId: actorOrgId, name }, tx);
|
||||
@@ -163,15 +166,18 @@ export const groupServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const isCustomRole = Boolean(customOrgRole);
|
||||
const hasRequiredNewRolePermission = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionGroupActions.ManagePrivileges,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Groups,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredNewRolePermission)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to create a more privileged group" });
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to update a more privileged group",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
if (isCustomRole) customRole = customOrgRole;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -342,15 +348,18 @@ export const groupServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
const { permission: groupRolePermission } = await permissionService.getOrgPermissionByRole(group.role, actorOrgId);
|
||||
|
||||
// check if user has broader or equal to privileges than group
|
||||
const hasRequiredPrivileges = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionGroupActions.AddMembers,
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionGroupActions.ManagePrivileges,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Groups,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
groupRolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPrivileges)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to add user to more privileged group" });
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to add user to more privileged group",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const user = await userDAL.findOne({ username });
|
||||
if (!user) throw new NotFoundError({ message: `Failed to find user with username ${username}` });
|
||||
@@ -415,15 +424,18 @@ export const groupServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
const { permission: groupRolePermission } = await permissionService.getOrgPermissionByRole(group.role, actorOrgId);
|
||||
|
||||
// check if user has broader or equal to privileges than group
|
||||
const hasRequiredPrivileges = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionGroupActions.RemoveMembers,
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionGroupActions.ManagePrivileges,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Groups,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
groupRolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPrivileges)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to delete user from more privileged group" });
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to delete user from more privileged group",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const user = await userDAL.findOne({ username });
|
||||
if (!user) throw new NotFoundError({ message: `Failed to find user with username ${username}` });
|
||||
|
||||
+21
-9
@@ -79,14 +79,18 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeV2ServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
// we need to validate that the privilege given is not higher than the assigning users permission
|
||||
// @ts-expect-error this is expected error because of one being really accurate rule definition other being a bit more broader. Both are valid casl rules
|
||||
targetIdentityPermission.update(targetIdentityPermission.rules.concat(customPermission));
|
||||
const hasRequiredPrivileges = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
ProjectPermissionIdentityActions.ManagePrivileges,
|
||||
ProjectPermissionSub.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
targetIdentityPermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPrivileges)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to update more privileged identity" });
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to update more privileged identity",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const existingSlug = await identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeDAL.findOne({
|
||||
slug,
|
||||
@@ -166,14 +170,18 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeV2ServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
// we need to validate that the privilege given is not higher than the assigning users permission
|
||||
// @ts-expect-error this is expected error because of one being really accurate rule definition other being a bit more broader. Both are valid casl rules
|
||||
targetIdentityPermission.update(targetIdentityPermission.rules.concat(data.permissions || []));
|
||||
const hasRequiredPrivileges = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
ProjectPermissionIdentityActions.ManagePrivileges,
|
||||
ProjectPermissionSub.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
targetIdentityPermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPrivileges)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to update more privileged identity" });
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to update more privileged identity",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
if (data?.slug) {
|
||||
const existingSlug = await identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeDAL.findOne({
|
||||
@@ -249,14 +257,18 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeV2ServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
actorOrgId,
|
||||
actionProjectType: ActionProjectType.Any
|
||||
});
|
||||
const hasRequiredPriviledges = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
ProjectPermissionIdentityActions.ManagePrivileges,
|
||||
ProjectPermissionSub.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
identityRolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPriviledges)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to update more privileged identity" });
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to update more privileged identity",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const deletedPrivilege = await identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeDAL.deleteById(identityPrivilege.id);
|
||||
return {
|
||||
|
||||
+21
-9
@@ -93,14 +93,18 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
// we need to validate that the privilege given is not higher than the assigning users permission
|
||||
// @ts-expect-error this is expected error because of one being really accurate rule definition other being a bit more broader. Both are valid casl rules
|
||||
targetIdentityPermission.update(targetIdentityPermission.rules.concat(customPermission));
|
||||
const hasRequiredPrivileges = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
ProjectPermissionIdentityActions.ManagePrivileges,
|
||||
ProjectPermissionSub.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
targetIdentityPermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPrivileges)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to update more privileged identity" });
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to update more privileged identity",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const existingSlug = await identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeDAL.findOne({
|
||||
slug,
|
||||
@@ -182,14 +186,18 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
// we need to validate that the privilege given is not higher than the assigning users permission
|
||||
// @ts-expect-error this is expected error because of one being really accurate rule definition other being a bit more broader. Both are valid casl rules
|
||||
targetIdentityPermission.update(targetIdentityPermission.rules.concat(data.permissions || []));
|
||||
const hasRequiredPrivileges = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
ProjectPermissionIdentityActions.ManagePrivileges,
|
||||
ProjectPermissionSub.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
targetIdentityPermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPrivileges)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to update more privileged identity" });
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to update more privileged identity",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const identityPrivilege = await identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeDAL.findOne({
|
||||
slug,
|
||||
@@ -283,14 +291,18 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
actorOrgId,
|
||||
actionProjectType: ActionProjectType.Any
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const hasRequiredPrivileges = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
ProjectPermissionIdentityActions.ManagePrivileges,
|
||||
ProjectPermissionSub.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
identityRolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPrivileges) throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to edit more privileged identity" });
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to edit more privileged identity",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const identityPrivilege = await identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeDAL.findOne({
|
||||
slug,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
import { MongoAbility } from "@casl/ability";
|
||||
|
||||
import { TOrganizations } from "@app/db/schemas";
|
||||
import { isAtLeastAsPrivileged } from "@app/lib/casl";
|
||||
import { validatePermissionBoundary } from "@app/lib/casl/boundary";
|
||||
import { ForbiddenRequestError, UnauthorizedError } from "@app/lib/errors";
|
||||
import { ActorAuthMethod, AuthMethod } from "@app/services/auth/auth-type";
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -60,8 +60,15 @@ const validatePrivilegeChangeOperation = (
|
||||
managedPermission: MongoAbility
|
||||
) => {
|
||||
// first we ensure if the actor has the permission to manage the privilege
|
||||
// if not, we check if the actor is indeed more privileged than the managed permission
|
||||
return actorPermission.can(action, subject) || isAtLeastAsPrivileged(actorPermission, managedPermission);
|
||||
if (actorPermission.can(action, subject)) {
|
||||
return {
|
||||
isValid: true,
|
||||
missingPermissions: []
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// if not, we check if the actor is indeed more privileged than the managed permission - this is the old system
|
||||
return validatePermissionBoundary(actorPermission, managedPermission);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
export { escapeHandlebarsMissingMetadata, isAuthMethodSaml, validateOrgSSO, validatePrivilegeChangeOperation };
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,22 +5,6 @@ import { PermissionConditionOperators } from "@app/lib/casl";
|
||||
|
||||
export const PermissionConditionSchema = {
|
||||
[PermissionConditionOperators.$IN]: z.string().trim().min(1).array(),
|
||||
[PermissionConditionOperators.$ALL]: z.string().trim().min(1).array(),
|
||||
[PermissionConditionOperators.$REGEX]: z
|
||||
.string()
|
||||
.min(1)
|
||||
.refine(
|
||||
(el) => {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
// eslint-disable-next-line no-new
|
||||
new RegExp(el);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
} catch {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{ message: "Invalid regex pattern" }
|
||||
),
|
||||
[PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
[PermissionConditionOperators.$NEQ]: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
[PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB]: z
|
||||
|
||||
+14
-8
@@ -80,16 +80,18 @@ export const projectUserAdditionalPrivilegeServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
// we need to validate that the privilege given is not higher than the assigning users permission
|
||||
// @ts-expect-error this is expected error because of one being really accurate rule definition other being a bit more broader. Both are valid casl rules
|
||||
targetUserPermission.update(targetUserPermission.rules.concat(customPermission));
|
||||
|
||||
const hasRequiredPriviledges = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
ProjectPermissionMemberActions.ManagePrivileges,
|
||||
ProjectPermissionSub.Member,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
targetUserPermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPriviledges)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to update more privileged identity" });
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to update more privileged user",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const existingSlug = await projectUserAdditionalPrivilegeDAL.findOne({
|
||||
slug,
|
||||
@@ -174,14 +176,18 @@ export const projectUserAdditionalPrivilegeServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
// we need to validate that the privilege given is not higher than the assigning users permission
|
||||
// @ts-expect-error this is expected error because of one being really accurate rule definition other being a bit more broader. Both are valid casl rules
|
||||
targetUserPermission.update(targetUserPermission.rules.concat(dto.permissions || []));
|
||||
const hasRequiredPrivileges = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
ProjectPermissionMemberActions.ManagePrivileges,
|
||||
ProjectPermissionSub.Member,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
targetUserPermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPrivileges)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to update more privileged identity" });
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to update more privileged user",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
if (dto?.slug) {
|
||||
const existingSlug = await projectUserAdditionalPrivilegeDAL.findOne({
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,669 @@
|
||||
import { createMongoAbility } from "@casl/ability";
|
||||
|
||||
import { PermissionConditionOperators } from ".";
|
||||
import { validatePermissionBoundary } from "./boundary";
|
||||
|
||||
describe("Validate Permission Boundary Function", () => {
|
||||
test.each([
|
||||
{
|
||||
title: "child with equal privilege",
|
||||
parentPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create", "edit", "delete", "read"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]),
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create", "edit", "delete", "read"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]),
|
||||
expectValid: true,
|
||||
missingPermissions: []
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
title: "child with less privilege",
|
||||
parentPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create", "edit", "delete", "read"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]),
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create", "edit"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]),
|
||||
expectValid: true,
|
||||
missingPermissions: []
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
title: "child with more privilege",
|
||||
parentPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]),
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create", "edit"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]),
|
||||
expectValid: false,
|
||||
missingPermissions: [{ action: "edit", subject: "secrets" }]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
title: "parent with multiple and child with multiple",
|
||||
parentPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create", "edit"],
|
||||
subject: "members"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]),
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "members"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]),
|
||||
expectValid: true,
|
||||
missingPermissions: []
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
title: "Child with no access",
|
||||
parentPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create", "edit"],
|
||||
subject: "members"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]),
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([]),
|
||||
expectValid: true,
|
||||
missingPermissions: []
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
title: "Parent and child disjoint set",
|
||||
parentPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create", "edit", "delete", "read"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: "dev" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
]),
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create", "edit", "delete", "read"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: "dev" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
]),
|
||||
expectValid: false,
|
||||
missingPermissions: ["create", "edit", "delete", "read"].map((el) => ({
|
||||
action: el,
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: "dev" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}))
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
title: "Parent with inverted rules",
|
||||
parentPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create", "edit", "delete", "read"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: "dev" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: "read",
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
inverted: true,
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: "dev" },
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB]: "/hello/**" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
]),
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: "read",
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: "dev" },
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: "/" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
]),
|
||||
expectValid: true,
|
||||
missingPermissions: []
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
title: "Parent with inverted rules - child accessing invalid one",
|
||||
parentPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create", "edit", "delete", "read"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: "dev" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: "read",
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
inverted: true,
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: "dev" },
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB]: "/hello/**" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
]),
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: "read",
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: "dev" },
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: "/hello/world" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
]),
|
||||
expectValid: false,
|
||||
missingPermissions: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: "read",
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: "dev" },
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: "/hello/world" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
])("Check permission: $title", ({ parentPermission, childPermission, expectValid, missingPermissions }) => {
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePermissionBoundary(parentPermission, childPermission);
|
||||
if (expectValid) {
|
||||
expect(permissionBoundary.isValid).toBeTruthy();
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
expect(permissionBoundary.isValid).toBeFalsy();
|
||||
expect(permissionBoundary.missingPermissions).toEqual(expect.arrayContaining(missingPermissions));
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
describe("Validate Permission Boundary: Checking Parent $eq operator", () => {
|
||||
const parentPermission = createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create", "read"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: "dev" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
]);
|
||||
|
||||
test.each([
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: "dev" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$IN,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$IN]: ["dev"] }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB]: "dev" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
}
|
||||
])("Child $operator truthy cases", ({ childPermission }) => {
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePermissionBoundary(parentPermission, childPermission);
|
||||
expect(permissionBoundary.isValid).toBeTruthy();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test.each([
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: "prod" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$IN,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$IN]: ["dev", "prod"] }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB]: "dev**" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$NEQ,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB]: "staging" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
}
|
||||
])("Child $operator falsy cases", ({ childPermission }) => {
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePermissionBoundary(parentPermission, childPermission);
|
||||
expect(permissionBoundary.isValid).toBeFalsy();
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
describe("Validate Permission Boundary: Checking Parent $neq operator", () => {
|
||||
const parentPermission = createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create", "read"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$NEQ]: "/hello" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
]);
|
||||
|
||||
test.each([
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: "/" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$NEQ,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$NEQ]: "/hello" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$IN,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$IN]: ["/", "/staging"] }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB]: "/dev**" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
}
|
||||
])("Child $operator truthy cases", ({ childPermission }) => {
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePermissionBoundary(parentPermission, childPermission);
|
||||
expect(permissionBoundary.isValid).toBeTruthy();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test.each([
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: "/hello" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$NEQ,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$NEQ]: "/" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$IN,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$IN]: ["/", "/hello"] }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB]: "/hello**" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
}
|
||||
])("Child $operator falsy cases", ({ childPermission }) => {
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePermissionBoundary(parentPermission, childPermission);
|
||||
expect(permissionBoundary.isValid).toBeFalsy();
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
describe("Validate Permission Boundary: Checking Parent $IN operator", () => {
|
||||
const parentPermission = createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["edit"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$IN]: ["dev", "staging"] }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
]);
|
||||
|
||||
test.each([
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["edit"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: "dev" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$IN,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["edit"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$IN]: ["dev"] }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: `${PermissionConditionOperators.$IN} - 2`,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["edit"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$IN]: ["dev", "staging"] }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["edit"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB]: "dev" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
}
|
||||
])("Child $operator truthy cases", ({ childPermission }) => {
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePermissionBoundary(parentPermission, childPermission);
|
||||
expect(permissionBoundary.isValid).toBeTruthy();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test.each([
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["edit"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: "prod" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$NEQ,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["edit"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$NEQ]: "dev" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$IN,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["edit"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$IN]: ["dev", "prod"] }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["edit"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
environment: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB]: "dev**" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
}
|
||||
])("Child $operator falsy cases", ({ childPermission }) => {
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePermissionBoundary(parentPermission, childPermission);
|
||||
expect(permissionBoundary.isValid).toBeFalsy();
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
describe("Validate Permission Boundary: Checking Parent $GLOB operator", () => {
|
||||
const parentPermission = createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create", "read"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB]: "/hello/**" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
]);
|
||||
|
||||
test.each([
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: "/hello/world" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$IN,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$IN]: ["/hello/world", "/hello/world2"] }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB]: "/hello/**/world" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
}
|
||||
])("Child $operator truthy cases", ({ childPermission }) => {
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePermissionBoundary(parentPermission, childPermission);
|
||||
expect(permissionBoundary.isValid).toBeTruthy();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test.each([
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: "/print" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$NEQ,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$NEQ]: "/hello/world" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$IN,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$IN]: ["/", "/hello"] }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
operator: PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB,
|
||||
childPermission: createMongoAbility([
|
||||
{
|
||||
action: ["create"],
|
||||
subject: "secrets",
|
||||
conditions: {
|
||||
secretPath: { [PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB]: "/hello**" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
])
|
||||
}
|
||||
])("Child $operator falsy cases", ({ childPermission }) => {
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePermissionBoundary(parentPermission, childPermission);
|
||||
expect(permissionBoundary.isValid).toBeFalsy();
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
|
||||
import { MongoAbility } from "@casl/ability";
|
||||
import { MongoQuery } from "@ucast/mongo2js";
|
||||
import picomatch from "picomatch";
|
||||
|
||||
import { PermissionConditionOperators } from "./index";
|
||||
|
||||
type TMissingPermission = {
|
||||
action: string;
|
||||
subject: string;
|
||||
conditions?: MongoQuery;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
type TPermissionConditionShape = {
|
||||
[PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: string;
|
||||
[PermissionConditionOperators.$NEQ]: string;
|
||||
[PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB]: string;
|
||||
[PermissionConditionOperators.$IN]: string[];
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const getPermissionSetID = (action: string, subject: string) => `${action}:${subject}`;
|
||||
const invertTheOperation = (shouldInvert: boolean, operation: boolean) => (shouldInvert ? !operation : operation);
|
||||
const formatConditionOperator = (condition: TPermissionConditionShape | string) => {
|
||||
return (
|
||||
typeof condition === "string" ? { [PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ]: condition } : condition
|
||||
) as TPermissionConditionShape;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const isOperatorsASubset = (parentSet: TPermissionConditionShape, subset: TPermissionConditionShape) => {
|
||||
// we compute each operator against each other in left hand side and right hand side
|
||||
if (subset[PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ] || subset[PermissionConditionOperators.$NEQ]) {
|
||||
const subsetOperatorValue = subset[PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ] || subset[PermissionConditionOperators.$NEQ];
|
||||
const isInverted = !subset[PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ];
|
||||
if (
|
||||
parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ] &&
|
||||
invertTheOperation(isInverted, parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ] !== subsetOperatorValue)
|
||||
) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (
|
||||
parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$NEQ] &&
|
||||
invertTheOperation(isInverted, parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$NEQ] === subsetOperatorValue)
|
||||
) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (
|
||||
parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$IN] &&
|
||||
invertTheOperation(isInverted, !parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$IN].includes(subsetOperatorValue))
|
||||
) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// ne and glob cannot match each other
|
||||
if (parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB] && isInverted) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (
|
||||
parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB] &&
|
||||
!picomatch.isMatch(subsetOperatorValue, parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB], { strictSlashes: false })
|
||||
) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (subset[PermissionConditionOperators.$IN]) {
|
||||
const subsetOperatorValue = subset[PermissionConditionOperators.$IN];
|
||||
if (
|
||||
parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ] &&
|
||||
(subsetOperatorValue.length !== 1 || subsetOperatorValue[0] !== parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ])
|
||||
) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (
|
||||
parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$NEQ] &&
|
||||
subsetOperatorValue.includes(parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$NEQ])
|
||||
) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (
|
||||
parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$IN] &&
|
||||
!subsetOperatorValue.every((el) => parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$IN].includes(el))
|
||||
) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (
|
||||
parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB] &&
|
||||
!subsetOperatorValue.every((el) =>
|
||||
picomatch.isMatch(el, parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB], {
|
||||
strictSlashes: false
|
||||
})
|
||||
)
|
||||
) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (subset[PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB]) {
|
||||
const subsetOperatorValue = subset[PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB];
|
||||
const { isGlob } = picomatch.scan(subsetOperatorValue);
|
||||
// if it's glob, all other fixed operators would make this superset because glob is powerful. like eq
|
||||
// example: $in [dev, prod] => glob: dev** could mean anything starting with dev: thus is bigger
|
||||
if (
|
||||
isGlob &&
|
||||
Object.keys(parentSet).some(
|
||||
(el) => el !== PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB && el !== PermissionConditionOperators.$NEQ
|
||||
)
|
||||
) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (
|
||||
parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ] &&
|
||||
parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$EQ] !== subsetOperatorValue
|
||||
) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (
|
||||
parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$NEQ] &&
|
||||
picomatch.isMatch(parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$NEQ], subsetOperatorValue, {
|
||||
strictSlashes: false
|
||||
})
|
||||
) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// if parent set is IN, glob cannot be used for children - It's a bigger scope
|
||||
if (
|
||||
parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$IN] &&
|
||||
!parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$IN].includes(subsetOperatorValue)
|
||||
) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (
|
||||
parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB] &&
|
||||
!picomatch.isMatch(subsetOperatorValue, parentSet[PermissionConditionOperators.$GLOB], {
|
||||
strictSlashes: false
|
||||
})
|
||||
) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const isSubsetForSamePermissionSubjectAction = (
|
||||
parentSetRules: ReturnType<MongoAbility["possibleRulesFor"]>,
|
||||
subsetRules: ReturnType<MongoAbility["possibleRulesFor"]>,
|
||||
appendToMissingPermission: (condition?: MongoQuery) => void
|
||||
) => {
|
||||
const isMissingConditionInParent = parentSetRules.every((el) => !el.conditions);
|
||||
if (isMissingConditionInParent) return true;
|
||||
|
||||
// all subset rules must pass in comparison to parent rul
|
||||
return subsetRules.every((subsetRule) => {
|
||||
const subsetRuleConditions = subsetRule.conditions as Record<string, TPermissionConditionShape | string>;
|
||||
// compare subset rule with all parent rules
|
||||
const isSubsetOfNonInvertedParentSet = parentSetRules
|
||||
.filter((el) => !el.inverted)
|
||||
.some((parentSetRule) => {
|
||||
// get conditions and iterate
|
||||
const parentSetRuleConditions = parentSetRule?.conditions as Record<string, TPermissionConditionShape | string>;
|
||||
if (!parentSetRuleConditions) return true;
|
||||
return Object.keys(parentSetRuleConditions).every((parentConditionField) => {
|
||||
// if parent condition is missing then it's never a subset
|
||||
if (!subsetRuleConditions?.[parentConditionField]) return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// standardize the conditions plain string operator => $eq function
|
||||
const parentRuleConditionOperators = formatConditionOperator(parentSetRuleConditions[parentConditionField]);
|
||||
const selectedSubsetRuleCondition = subsetRuleConditions?.[parentConditionField];
|
||||
const subsetRuleConditionOperators = formatConditionOperator(selectedSubsetRuleCondition);
|
||||
return isOperatorsASubset(parentRuleConditionOperators, subsetRuleConditionOperators);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const invertedParentSetRules = parentSetRules.filter((el) => el.inverted);
|
||||
const isNotSubsetOfInvertedParentSet = invertedParentSetRules.length
|
||||
? !invertedParentSetRules.some((parentSetRule) => {
|
||||
// get conditions and iterate
|
||||
const parentSetRuleConditions = parentSetRule?.conditions as Record<
|
||||
string,
|
||||
TPermissionConditionShape | string
|
||||
>;
|
||||
if (!parentSetRuleConditions) return true;
|
||||
return Object.keys(parentSetRuleConditions).every((parentConditionField) => {
|
||||
// if parent condition is missing then it's never a subset
|
||||
if (!subsetRuleConditions?.[parentConditionField]) return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// standardize the conditions plain string operator => $eq function
|
||||
const parentRuleConditionOperators = formatConditionOperator(parentSetRuleConditions[parentConditionField]);
|
||||
const selectedSubsetRuleCondition = subsetRuleConditions?.[parentConditionField];
|
||||
const subsetRuleConditionOperators = formatConditionOperator(selectedSubsetRuleCondition);
|
||||
return isOperatorsASubset(parentRuleConditionOperators, subsetRuleConditionOperators);
|
||||
});
|
||||
})
|
||||
: true;
|
||||
const isSubset = isSubsetOfNonInvertedParentSet && isNotSubsetOfInvertedParentSet;
|
||||
if (!isSubset) {
|
||||
appendToMissingPermission(subsetRule.conditions);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return isSubset;
|
||||
});
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
export const validatePermissionBoundary = (parentSetPermissions: MongoAbility, subsetPermissions: MongoAbility) => {
|
||||
const checkedPermissionRules = new Set<string>();
|
||||
const missingPermissions: TMissingPermission[] = [];
|
||||
|
||||
subsetPermissions.rules.forEach((subsetPermissionRules) => {
|
||||
const subsetPermissionSubject = subsetPermissionRules.subject.toString();
|
||||
let subsetPermissionActions: string[] = [];
|
||||
|
||||
// actions can be string or string[]
|
||||
if (typeof subsetPermissionRules.action === "string") {
|
||||
subsetPermissionActions.push(subsetPermissionRules.action);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
subsetPermissionRules.action.forEach((subsetPermissionAction) => {
|
||||
subsetPermissionActions.push(subsetPermissionAction);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// if action is already processed ignore
|
||||
subsetPermissionActions = subsetPermissionActions.filter(
|
||||
(el) => !checkedPermissionRules.has(getPermissionSetID(el, subsetPermissionSubject))
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!subsetPermissionActions.length) return;
|
||||
subsetPermissionActions.forEach((subsetPermissionAction) => {
|
||||
const parentSetRulesOfSubset = parentSetPermissions.possibleRulesFor(
|
||||
subsetPermissionAction,
|
||||
subsetPermissionSubject
|
||||
);
|
||||
const nonInveretedOnes = parentSetRulesOfSubset.filter((el) => !el.inverted);
|
||||
if (!nonInveretedOnes.length) {
|
||||
missingPermissions.push({ action: subsetPermissionAction, subject: subsetPermissionSubject });
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const subsetRules = subsetPermissions.possibleRulesFor(subsetPermissionAction, subsetPermissionSubject);
|
||||
isSubsetForSamePermissionSubjectAction(parentSetRulesOfSubset, subsetRules, (conditions) => {
|
||||
missingPermissions.push({ action: subsetPermissionAction, subject: subsetPermissionSubject, conditions });
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
subsetPermissionActions.forEach((el) =>
|
||||
checkedPermissionRules.add(getPermissionSetID(el, subsetPermissionSubject))
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
if (missingPermissions.length) {
|
||||
return { isValid: false as const, missingPermissions };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return { isValid: true };
|
||||
};
|
||||
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||
/* eslint-disable @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-assignment */
|
||||
import { buildMongoQueryMatcher, MongoAbility } from "@casl/ability";
|
||||
import { buildMongoQueryMatcher } from "@casl/ability";
|
||||
import { FieldCondition, FieldInstruction, JsInterpreter } from "@ucast/mongo2js";
|
||||
import picomatch from "picomatch";
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -20,45 +20,8 @@ const glob: JsInterpreter<FieldCondition<string>> = (node, object, context) => {
|
||||
|
||||
export const conditionsMatcher = buildMongoQueryMatcher({ $glob }, { glob });
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Extracts and formats permissions from a CASL Ability object or a raw permission set.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
const extractPermissions = (ability: MongoAbility) => {
|
||||
const permissions: string[] = [];
|
||||
ability.rules.forEach((permission) => {
|
||||
if (typeof permission.action === "string") {
|
||||
permissions.push(`${permission.action}_${permission.subject as string}`);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
permission.action.forEach((permissionAction) => {
|
||||
permissions.push(`${permissionAction}_${permission.subject as string}`);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
return permissions;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Compares two sets of permissions to determine if the first set is at least as privileged as the second set.
|
||||
* The function checks if all permissions in the second set are contained within the first set and if the first set has equal or more permissions.
|
||||
*
|
||||
*/
|
||||
export const isAtLeastAsPrivileged = (permissions1: MongoAbility, permissions2: MongoAbility) => {
|
||||
const set1 = new Set(extractPermissions(permissions1));
|
||||
const set2 = new Set(extractPermissions(permissions2));
|
||||
|
||||
for (const perm of set2) {
|
||||
if (!set1.has(perm)) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return set1.size >= set2.size;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
export enum PermissionConditionOperators {
|
||||
$IN = "$in",
|
||||
$ALL = "$all",
|
||||
$REGEX = "$regex",
|
||||
$EQ = "$eq",
|
||||
$NEQ = "$ne",
|
||||
$GLOB = "$glob"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -52,10 +52,18 @@ export class ForbiddenRequestError extends Error {
|
||||
|
||||
error: unknown;
|
||||
|
||||
constructor({ name, error, message }: { message?: string; name?: string; error?: unknown } = {}) {
|
||||
details?: unknown;
|
||||
|
||||
constructor({
|
||||
name,
|
||||
error,
|
||||
message,
|
||||
details
|
||||
}: { message?: string; name?: string; error?: unknown; details?: unknown } = {}) {
|
||||
super(message ?? "You are not allowed to access this resource");
|
||||
this.name = name || "ForbiddenError";
|
||||
this.error = error;
|
||||
this.details = details;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ export const pingGatewayAndVerify = async ({
|
||||
error: err as Error
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
for (let attempt = 1; attempt <= maxRetries; attempt += 1) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const stream = quicClient.connection.newStream("bidi");
|
||||
@@ -108,17 +109,13 @@ export const pingGatewayAndVerify = async ({
|
||||
const { value, done } = await reader.read();
|
||||
|
||||
if (done) {
|
||||
throw new BadRequestError({
|
||||
message: "Gateway closed before receiving PONG"
|
||||
});
|
||||
throw new Error("Gateway closed before receiving PONG");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const response = Buffer.from(value).toString();
|
||||
|
||||
if (response !== "PONG\n" && response !== "PONG") {
|
||||
throw new BadRequestError({
|
||||
message: `Failed to Ping. Unexpected response: ${response}`
|
||||
});
|
||||
throw new Error(`Failed to Ping. Unexpected response: ${response}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
reader.releaseLock();
|
||||
@@ -146,6 +143,7 @@ interface TProxyServer {
|
||||
server: net.Server;
|
||||
port: number;
|
||||
cleanup: () => Promise<void>;
|
||||
getProxyError: () => string;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const setupProxyServer = async ({
|
||||
@@ -170,6 +168,7 @@ const setupProxyServer = async ({
|
||||
error: err as Error
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
const proxyErrorMsg = [""];
|
||||
|
||||
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
|
||||
const server = net.createServer();
|
||||
@@ -185,31 +184,33 @@ const setupProxyServer = async ({
|
||||
const forwardWriter = stream.writable.getWriter();
|
||||
await forwardWriter.write(Buffer.from(`FORWARD-TCP ${targetHost}:${targetPort}\n`));
|
||||
forwardWriter.releaseLock();
|
||||
/* eslint-disable @typescript-eslint/no-misused-promises */
|
||||
|
||||
// Set up bidirectional copy
|
||||
const setupCopy = async () => {
|
||||
const setupCopy = () => {
|
||||
// Client to QUIC
|
||||
// eslint-disable-next-line
|
||||
(async () => {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const writer = stream.writable.getWriter();
|
||||
const writer = stream.writable.getWriter();
|
||||
|
||||
// Create a handler for client data
|
||||
clientConn.on("data", async (chunk) => {
|
||||
await writer.write(chunk);
|
||||
// Create a handler for client data
|
||||
clientConn.on("data", (chunk) => {
|
||||
writer.write(chunk).catch((err) => {
|
||||
proxyErrorMsg.push((err as Error)?.message);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Handle client connection close
|
||||
clientConn.on("end", async () => {
|
||||
await writer.close();
|
||||
// Handle client connection close
|
||||
clientConn.on("end", () => {
|
||||
writer.close().catch((err) => {
|
||||
logger.error(err);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
clientConn.on("error", async (err) => {
|
||||
await writer.abort(err);
|
||||
clientConn.on("error", (clientConnErr) => {
|
||||
writer.abort(clientConnErr?.message).catch((err) => {
|
||||
proxyErrorMsg.push((err as Error)?.message);
|
||||
});
|
||||
} catch (err) {
|
||||
clientConn.destroy();
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
})();
|
||||
|
||||
// QUIC to Client
|
||||
@@ -238,15 +239,18 @@ const setupProxyServer = async ({
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
} catch (err) {
|
||||
proxyErrorMsg.push((err as Error)?.message);
|
||||
clientConn.destroy();
|
||||
}
|
||||
})();
|
||||
};
|
||||
await setupCopy();
|
||||
//
|
||||
|
||||
setupCopy();
|
||||
// Handle connection closure
|
||||
clientConn.on("close", async () => {
|
||||
await stream.destroy();
|
||||
clientConn.on("close", () => {
|
||||
stream.destroy().catch((err) => {
|
||||
proxyErrorMsg.push((err as Error)?.message);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const cleanup = async () => {
|
||||
@@ -254,13 +258,18 @@ const setupProxyServer = async ({
|
||||
await stream.destroy();
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
clientConn.on("error", (err) => {
|
||||
logger.error(err, "Client socket error");
|
||||
void cleanup();
|
||||
reject(err);
|
||||
clientConn.on("error", (clientConnErr) => {
|
||||
logger.error(clientConnErr, "Client socket error");
|
||||
cleanup().catch((err) => {
|
||||
logger.error(err, "Client conn cleanup");
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
clientConn.on("end", cleanup);
|
||||
clientConn.on("end", () => {
|
||||
cleanup().catch((err) => {
|
||||
logger.error(err, "Client conn end");
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
} catch (err) {
|
||||
logger.error(err, "Failed to establish target connection:");
|
||||
clientConn.end();
|
||||
@@ -272,12 +281,12 @@ const setupProxyServer = async ({
|
||||
reject(err);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
server.on("close", async () => {
|
||||
await quicClient?.destroy();
|
||||
server.on("close", () => {
|
||||
quicClient?.destroy().catch((err) => {
|
||||
logger.error(err, "Failed to destroy quic client");
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
/* eslint-enable */
|
||||
|
||||
server.listen(0, () => {
|
||||
const address = server.address();
|
||||
if (!address || typeof address === "string") {
|
||||
@@ -293,7 +302,8 @@ const setupProxyServer = async ({
|
||||
cleanup: async () => {
|
||||
server.close();
|
||||
await quicClient?.destroy();
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
getProxyError: () => proxyErrorMsg.join(",")
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
@@ -316,7 +326,7 @@ export const withGatewayProxy = async (
|
||||
const { relayHost, relayPort, targetHost, targetPort, tlsOptions, identityId, orgId } = options;
|
||||
|
||||
// Setup the proxy server
|
||||
const { port, cleanup } = await setupProxyServer({
|
||||
const { port, cleanup, getProxyError } = await setupProxyServer({
|
||||
targetHost,
|
||||
targetPort,
|
||||
relayPort,
|
||||
@@ -330,8 +340,12 @@ export const withGatewayProxy = async (
|
||||
// Execute the callback with the allocated port
|
||||
await callback(port);
|
||||
} catch (err) {
|
||||
logger.error(err, "Failed to proxy");
|
||||
throw new BadRequestError({ message: (err as Error)?.message });
|
||||
const proxyErrorMessage = getProxyError();
|
||||
if (proxyErrorMessage) {
|
||||
logger.error(new Error(proxyErrorMessage), "Failed to proxy");
|
||||
}
|
||||
logger.error(err, "Failed to do gateway");
|
||||
throw new BadRequestError({ message: proxyErrorMessage || (err as Error)?.message });
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
// Ensure cleanup happens regardless of success or failure
|
||||
await cleanup();
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
import crypto from "node:crypto";
|
||||
|
||||
const TURN_TOKEN_TTL = 60 * 60 * 1000; // 24 hours in milliseconds
|
||||
const TURN_TOKEN_TTL = 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000; // 24 hours in milliseconds
|
||||
export const getTurnCredentials = (id: string, authSecret: string, ttl = TURN_TOKEN_TTL) => {
|
||||
const timestamp = Math.floor((Date.now() + ttl) / 1000);
|
||||
const username = `${timestamp}:${id}`;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -122,7 +122,8 @@ export const fastifyErrHandler = fastifyPlugin(async (server: FastifyZodProvider
|
||||
reqId: req.id,
|
||||
statusCode: HttpStatusCodes.Forbidden,
|
||||
message: error.message,
|
||||
error: error.name
|
||||
error: error.name,
|
||||
details: error?.details
|
||||
});
|
||||
} else if (error instanceof RateLimitError) {
|
||||
void res.status(HttpStatusCodes.TooManyRequests).send({
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -102,16 +102,18 @@ export const groupProjectServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
project.id
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const hasRequiredPrivileges = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
ProjectPermissionGroupActions.ManagePrivileges,
|
||||
ProjectPermissionSub.Groups,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPrivileges) {
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to assign group to a more privileged role" });
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to assign group to a more privileged role",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// validate custom roles input
|
||||
@@ -272,17 +274,18 @@ export const groupProjectServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
requestedRoleChange,
|
||||
project.id
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const hasRequiredPrivileges = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
ProjectPermissionGroupActions.ManagePrivileges,
|
||||
ProjectPermissionSub.Groups,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPrivileges) {
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to assign group to a more privileged role" });
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to assign group to a more privileged role",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// validate custom roles input
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -339,16 +339,17 @@ export const identityAwsAuthServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
actorOrgId
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (
|
||||
!validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.RevokeAuth,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.RevokeAuth,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
message: "Failed to revoke aws auth of identity with more privileged role"
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to revoke aws auth of identity with more privileged role",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const revokedIdentityAwsAuth = await identityAwsAuthDAL.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -312,17 +312,17 @@ export const identityAzureAuthServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
actorAuthMethod,
|
||||
actorOrgId
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (
|
||||
!validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.RevokeAuth,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.RevokeAuth,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
message: "Failed to revoke azure auth of identity with more privileged role"
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to revoke azure auth of identity with more privileged role",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const revokedIdentityAzureAuth = await identityAzureAuthDAL.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -358,17 +358,17 @@ export const identityGcpAuthServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
actorAuthMethod,
|
||||
actorOrgId
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const hasRequiredPrivileges = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.RevokeAuth,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPrivileges)
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
message: "Failed to revoke gcp auth of identity with more privileged role"
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to revoke gcp auth of identity with more privileged role",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const revokedIdentityGcpAuth = await identityGcpAuthDAL.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -508,19 +508,18 @@ export const identityJwtAuthServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
actorOrgId
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// revoke auth identity - org permission
|
||||
if (
|
||||
!validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.RevokeAuth,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
)
|
||||
) {
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.RevokeAuth,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
message: "Failed to revoke JWT auth of identity with more privileged role"
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to revoke jwt auth of identity with more privileged role",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const revokedIdentityJwtAuth = await identityJwtAuthDAL.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
||||
const deletedJwtAuth = await identityJwtAuthDAL.delete({ identityId }, tx);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -487,17 +487,17 @@ export const identityKubernetesAuthServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
actorAuthMethod,
|
||||
actorOrgId
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (
|
||||
!validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.RevokeAuth,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.RevokeAuth,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
message: "Failed to revoke kubernetes auth of identity with more privileged role"
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to revoke kubernetes auth of identity with more privileged role",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const revokedIdentityKubernetesAuth = await identityKubernetesAuthDAL.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -428,18 +428,18 @@ export const identityOidcAuthServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
actorOrgId
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (
|
||||
!validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.RevokeAuth,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
)
|
||||
) {
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.RevokeAuth,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
message: "Failed to revoke OIDC auth of identity with more privileged role"
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to revoke oidc auth of identity with more privileged role",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const revokedIdentityOidcAuth = await identityOidcAuthDAL.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
||||
const deletedOidcAuth = await identityOidcAuthDAL.delete({ identityId }, tx);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -90,16 +90,18 @@ export const identityProjectServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
projectId
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const hasRequiredPriviledges = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
ProjectPermissionIdentityActions.ManagePrivileges,
|
||||
ProjectPermissionSub.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPriviledges) {
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to change to a more privileged role" });
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to assign to a more privileged role",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// validate custom roles input
|
||||
@@ -189,15 +191,18 @@ export const identityProjectServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
projectId
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const hasRequiredPriviledges = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
ProjectPermissionIdentityActions.ManagePrivileges,
|
||||
ProjectPermissionSub.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPriviledges) {
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to change to a more privileged role" });
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to change to a more privileged role",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// validate custom roles input
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -245,18 +245,18 @@ export const identityTokenAuthServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
actorOrgId
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (
|
||||
!validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.RevokeAuth,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
)
|
||||
) {
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.RevokeAuth,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
message: "Failed to revoke Token Auth of identity with more privileged role"
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to revoke token auth of identity with more privileged role",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const revokedIdentityTokenAuth = await identityTokenAuthDAL.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
||||
const deletedTokenAuth = await identityTokenAuthDAL.delete({ identityId }, tx);
|
||||
@@ -303,16 +303,17 @@ export const identityTokenAuthServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
actorOrgId
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const hasPriviledge = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.CreateToken,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!hasPriviledge)
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
message: "Failed to create token for identity with more privileged role"
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to create token for identity with more privileged role",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const identityTokenAuth = await identityTokenAuthDAL.findOne({ identityId });
|
||||
@@ -429,17 +430,17 @@ export const identityTokenAuthServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
actorAuthMethod,
|
||||
actorOrgId
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const hasPriviledge = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.CreateToken,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!hasPriviledge)
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
message: "Failed to update token for identity with more privileged role"
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to update token for identity with more privileged role",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const [token] = await identityAccessTokenDAL.update(
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -367,17 +367,17 @@ export const identityUaServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
actorAuthMethod,
|
||||
actorOrgId
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (
|
||||
!validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.RevokeAuth,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.RevokeAuth,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
message: "Failed to revoke universal auth of identity with more privileged role"
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to revoke universal auth of identity with more privileged role",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const revokedIdentityUniversalAuth = await identityUaDAL.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
||||
@@ -422,17 +422,17 @@ export const identityUaServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
actorAuthMethod,
|
||||
actorOrgId
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (
|
||||
!validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.CreateToken,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.CreateToken,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
message: "Failed to add identity to project with more privileged role"
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to create client secret for a more privileged identity.",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const appCfg = getConfig();
|
||||
@@ -490,16 +490,17 @@ export const identityUaServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
actorOrgId
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (
|
||||
!validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.GetToken,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.GetToken,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
message: "Failed to get identity client secret with more privileged role"
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to get identity client secret with more privileged role",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const identityUniversalAuth = await identityUaDAL.findOne({
|
||||
@@ -546,17 +547,17 @@ export const identityUaServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
actorAuthMethod,
|
||||
actorOrgId
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (
|
||||
!validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.GetToken,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.GetToken,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
message: "Failed to read identity client secret of project with more privileged role"
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to read identity client secret of identity with more privileged role",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const clientSecret = await identityUaClientSecretDAL.findById(clientSecretId);
|
||||
@@ -597,22 +598,24 @@ export const identityUaServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
actorOrgId
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (
|
||||
!validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.DeleteToken,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
)
|
||||
) {
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.DeleteToken,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid) {
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
message: "Failed to revoke identity client secret with more privileged role"
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to revoke identity client secret with more privileged role",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const clientSecret = await identityUaClientSecretDAL.updateById(clientSecretId, {
|
||||
isClientSecretRevoked: true
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
return { ...clientSecret, identityId, orgId: identityMembershipOrg.orgId };
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -57,14 +57,18 @@ export const identityServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
orgId
|
||||
);
|
||||
const isCustomRole = Boolean(customRole);
|
||||
const hasRequiredPriviledges = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.ManagePrivileges,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPriviledges)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to create a more privileged identity" });
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to create a more privileged identity",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const plan = await licenseService.getPlan(orgId);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -134,15 +138,18 @@ export const identityServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const isCustomRole = Boolean(customOrgRole);
|
||||
const hasRequiredNewRolePermission = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
const appliedRolePermissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
OrgPermissionIdentityActions.ManagePrivileges,
|
||||
OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredNewRolePermission)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({ message: "Failed to create a more privileged identity" });
|
||||
if (!appliedRolePermissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: "Failed to create a more privileged identity",
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: appliedRolePermissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
if (isCustomRole) customRole = customOrgRole;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -207,6 +214,7 @@ export const identityServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
actorAuthMethod,
|
||||
actorOrgId
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
ForbiddenError.from(permission).throwUnlessCan(OrgPermissionIdentityActions.Delete, OrgPermissionSubjects.Identity);
|
||||
|
||||
const deletedIdentity = await identityDAL.deleteById(id);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -274,18 +274,18 @@ export const projectMembershipServiceFactory = ({
|
||||
projectId
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const hasRequiredPriviledges = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
|
||||
ProjectPermissionMemberActions.ManagePrivileges,
|
||||
ProjectPermissionSub.Member,
|
||||
permission,
|
||||
rolePermission
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!hasRequiredPriviledges) {
|
||||
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
|
||||
message: `Failed to change to a more privileged role ${requestedRoleChange}`
|
||||
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
|
||||
message: `Failed to change to a more privileged role ${requestedRoleChange}`,
|
||||
details: { missingPermissions: permissionBoundary.missingPermissions }
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// validate custom roles input
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
|
||||
import path from "path";
|
||||
import { defineConfig } from "vitest/config";
|
||||
|
||||
export default defineConfig({
|
||||
test: {
|
||||
globals: true,
|
||||
env: {
|
||||
NODE_ENV: "test"
|
||||
},
|
||||
include: ["./src/**/*.test.ts"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
resolve: {
|
||||
alias: {
|
||||
"@app": path.resolve(__dirname, "./src")
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user