misc: added privilege version checks

This commit is contained in:
Sheen Capadngan
2025-03-14 01:59:07 +08:00
parent fc651f6645
commit dc2358bbaa
20 changed files with 119 additions and 46 deletions
+10 -4
View File
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ export const groupServiceFactory = ({
const createGroup = async ({ name, slug, role, actor, actorId, actorAuthMethod, actorOrgId }: TCreateGroupDTO) => {
if (!actorOrgId) throw new UnauthorizedError({ message: "No organization ID provided in request" });
const { permission } = await permissionService.getOrgPermission(
const { permission, membership } = await permissionService.getOrgPermission(
actor,
actorId,
actorOrgId,
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ export const groupServiceFactory = ({
const isCustomRole = Boolean(customRole);
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
membership.shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem,
OrgPermissionGroupActions.ManagePrivileges,
OrgPermissionSubjects.Groups,
permission,
@@ -138,13 +139,14 @@ export const groupServiceFactory = ({
}: TUpdateGroupDTO) => {
if (!actorOrgId) throw new UnauthorizedError({ message: "No organization ID provided in request" });
const { permission } = await permissionService.getOrgPermission(
const { permission, membership } = await permissionService.getOrgPermission(
actor,
actorId,
actorOrgId,
actorAuthMethod,
actorOrgId
);
ForbiddenError.from(permission).throwUnlessCan(OrgPermissionGroupActions.Edit, OrgPermissionSubjects.Groups);
const plan = await licenseService.getPlan(actorOrgId);
@@ -167,6 +169,7 @@ export const groupServiceFactory = ({
const isCustomRole = Boolean(customOrgRole);
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
membership.shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem,
OrgPermissionGroupActions.ManagePrivileges,
OrgPermissionSubjects.Groups,
permission,
@@ -313,7 +316,7 @@ export const groupServiceFactory = ({
const addUserToGroup = async ({ id, username, actor, actorId, actorAuthMethod, actorOrgId }: TAddUserToGroupDTO) => {
if (!actorOrgId) throw new UnauthorizedError({ message: "No organization ID provided in request" });
const { permission } = await permissionService.getOrgPermission(
const { permission, membership } = await permissionService.getOrgPermission(
actor,
actorId,
actorOrgId,
@@ -349,11 +352,13 @@ export const groupServiceFactory = ({
// check if user has broader or equal to privileges than group
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
membership.shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem,
OrgPermissionGroupActions.AddMembers,
OrgPermissionSubjects.Groups,
permission,
groupRolePermission
);
if (!permissionBoundary.isValid)
throw new ForbiddenRequestError({
name: "PermissionBoundaryError",
@@ -389,7 +394,7 @@ export const groupServiceFactory = ({
}: TRemoveUserFromGroupDTO) => {
if (!actorOrgId) throw new UnauthorizedError({ message: "No organization ID provided in request" });
const { permission } = await permissionService.getOrgPermission(
const { permission, membership } = await permissionService.getOrgPermission(
actor,
actorId,
actorOrgId,
@@ -425,6 +430,7 @@ export const groupServiceFactory = ({
// check if user has broader or equal to privileges than group
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
membership.shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem,
OrgPermissionGroupActions.RemoveMembers,
OrgPermissionSubjects.Groups,
permission,
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeV2ServiceFactory = ({
ProjectPermissionIdentityActions.Edit,
subject(ProjectPermissionSub.Identity, { identityId })
);
const { permission: targetIdentityPermission } = await permissionService.getProjectPermission({
const { permission: targetIdentityPermission, membership } = await permissionService.getProjectPermission({
actor: ActorType.IDENTITY,
actorId: identityId,
projectId: identityProjectMembership.projectId,
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeV2ServiceFactory = ({
// @ts-expect-error this is expected error because of one being really accurate rule definition other being a bit more broader. Both are valid casl rules
targetIdentityPermission.update(targetIdentityPermission.rules.concat(customPermission));
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
membership.shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem,
ProjectPermissionIdentityActions.ManagePrivileges,
ProjectPermissionSub.Identity,
permission,
@@ -158,7 +159,7 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeV2ServiceFactory = ({
ProjectPermissionIdentityActions.Edit,
subject(ProjectPermissionSub.Identity, { identityId: identityProjectMembership.identityId })
);
const { permission: targetIdentityPermission } = await permissionService.getProjectPermission({
const { permission: targetIdentityPermission, membership } = await permissionService.getProjectPermission({
actor: ActorType.IDENTITY,
actorId: identityProjectMembership.identityId,
projectId: identityProjectMembership.projectId,
@@ -171,6 +172,7 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeV2ServiceFactory = ({
// @ts-expect-error this is expected error because of one being really accurate rule definition other being a bit more broader. Both are valid casl rules
targetIdentityPermission.update(targetIdentityPermission.rules.concat(data.permissions || []));
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
membership.shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem,
ProjectPermissionIdentityActions.ManagePrivileges,
ProjectPermissionSub.Identity,
permission,
@@ -237,7 +239,7 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeV2ServiceFactory = ({
message: `Failed to find identity with membership ${identityPrivilege.projectMembershipId}`
});
const { permission } = await permissionService.getProjectPermission({
const { permission, membership } = await permissionService.getProjectPermission({
actor,
actorId,
projectId: identityProjectMembership.projectId,
@@ -258,6 +260,7 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeV2ServiceFactory = ({
actionProjectType: ActionProjectType.Any
});
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
membership.shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem,
ProjectPermissionIdentityActions.ManagePrivileges,
ProjectPermissionSub.Identity,
permission,
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeServiceFactory = ({
if (!identityProjectMembership)
throw new NotFoundError({ message: `Failed to find identity with id ${identityId}` });
const { permission } = await permissionService.getProjectPermission({
const { permission, membership } = await permissionService.getProjectPermission({
actor,
actorId,
projectId: identityProjectMembership.projectId,
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeServiceFactory = ({
// @ts-expect-error this is expected error because of one being really accurate rule definition other being a bit more broader. Both are valid casl rules
targetIdentityPermission.update(targetIdentityPermission.rules.concat(customPermission));
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
membership.shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem,
ProjectPermissionIdentityActions.ManagePrivileges,
ProjectPermissionSub.Identity,
permission,
@@ -160,7 +161,7 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeServiceFactory = ({
if (!identityProjectMembership)
throw new NotFoundError({ message: `Failed to find identity with id ${identityId}` });
const { permission } = await permissionService.getProjectPermission({
const { permission, membership } = await permissionService.getProjectPermission({
actor,
actorId,
projectId: identityProjectMembership.projectId,
@@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeServiceFactory = ({
// @ts-expect-error this is expected error because of one being really accurate rule definition other being a bit more broader. Both are valid casl rules
targetIdentityPermission.update(targetIdentityPermission.rules.concat(data.permissions || []));
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
membership.shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem,
ProjectPermissionIdentityActions.ManagePrivileges,
ProjectPermissionSub.Identity,
permission,
@@ -270,7 +272,7 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeServiceFactory = ({
if (!identityProjectMembership)
throw new NotFoundError({ message: `Failed to find identity with id ${identityId}` });
const { permission } = await permissionService.getProjectPermission({
const { permission, membership } = await permissionService.getProjectPermission({
actor,
actorId,
projectId: identityProjectMembership.projectId,
@@ -292,6 +294,7 @@ export const identityProjectAdditionalPrivilegeServiceFactory = ({
actionProjectType: ActionProjectType.Any
});
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
membership.shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem,
ProjectPermissionIdentityActions.ManagePrivileges,
ProjectPermissionSub.Identity,
permission,
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ export const permissionDALFactory = (db: TDbClient) => {
.join(TableName.Organization, `${TableName.Organization}.id`, `${TableName.OrgMembership}.orgId`)
.select(
selectAllTableCols(TableName.OrgMembership),
db.ref("shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem").withSchema(TableName.Organization),
db.ref("slug").withSchema(TableName.OrgRoles).withSchema(TableName.OrgRoles).as("customRoleSlug"),
db.ref("permissions").withSchema(TableName.OrgRoles),
db.ref("authEnforced").withSchema(TableName.Organization).as("orgAuthEnforced"),
@@ -70,7 +71,8 @@ export const permissionDALFactory = (db: TDbClient) => {
OrgMembershipsSchema.extend({
permissions: z.unknown(),
orgAuthEnforced: z.boolean().optional().nullable(),
customRoleSlug: z.string().optional().nullable()
customRoleSlug: z.string().optional().nullable(),
shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem: z.boolean()
}).parse(el),
childrenMapper: [
{
@@ -118,7 +120,9 @@ export const permissionDALFactory = (db: TDbClient) => {
.select(selectAllTableCols(TableName.IdentityOrgMembership))
.select(db.ref("authEnforced").withSchema(TableName.Organization).as("orgAuthEnforced"))
.select("permissions")
.select(db.ref("shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem").withSchema(TableName.Organization))
.first();
return membership;
} catch (error) {
throw new DatabaseError({ error, name: "GetOrgIdentityPermission" });
@@ -668,7 +672,8 @@ export const permissionDALFactory = (db: TDbClient) => {
db.ref("authEnforced").withSchema(TableName.Organization).as("orgAuthEnforced"),
db.ref("orgId").withSchema(TableName.Project),
db.ref("type").withSchema(TableName.Project).as("projectType"),
db.ref("id").withSchema(TableName.Project).as("projectId")
db.ref("id").withSchema(TableName.Project).as("projectId"),
db.ref("shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem").withSchema(TableName.Organization)
);
const [userPermission] = sqlNestRelationships({
@@ -684,7 +689,8 @@ export const permissionDALFactory = (db: TDbClient) => {
groupMembershipCreatedAt,
groupMembershipUpdatedAt,
membershipUpdatedAt,
projectType
projectType,
shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem
}) => ({
orgId,
orgAuthEnforced,
@@ -694,7 +700,8 @@ export const permissionDALFactory = (db: TDbClient) => {
projectType,
id: membershipId || groupMembershipId,
createdAt: membershipCreatedAt || groupMembershipCreatedAt,
updatedAt: membershipUpdatedAt || groupMembershipUpdatedAt
updatedAt: membershipUpdatedAt || groupMembershipUpdatedAt,
shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem
}),
childrenMapper: [
{
@@ -995,6 +1002,7 @@ export const permissionDALFactory = (db: TDbClient) => {
`${TableName.IdentityProjectMembership}.projectId`,
`${TableName.Project}.id`
)
.join(TableName.Organization, `${TableName.Project}.orgId`, `${TableName.Organization}.id`)
.leftJoin(TableName.IdentityMetadata, (queryBuilder) => {
void queryBuilder
.on(`${TableName.Identity}.id`, `${TableName.IdentityMetadata}.identityId`)
@@ -1012,6 +1020,7 @@ export const permissionDALFactory = (db: TDbClient) => {
db.ref("updatedAt").withSchema(TableName.IdentityProjectMembership).as("membershipUpdatedAt"),
db.ref("slug").withSchema(TableName.ProjectRoles).as("customRoleSlug"),
db.ref("permissions").withSchema(TableName.ProjectRoles),
db.ref("shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem").withSchema(TableName.Organization),
db.ref("id").withSchema(TableName.IdentityProjectAdditionalPrivilege).as("identityApId"),
db.ref("permissions").withSchema(TableName.IdentityProjectAdditionalPrivilege).as("identityApPermissions"),
db
@@ -1045,7 +1054,8 @@ export const permissionDALFactory = (db: TDbClient) => {
membershipUpdatedAt,
orgId,
identityName,
projectType
projectType,
shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem
}) => ({
id: membershipId,
identityId,
@@ -1055,6 +1065,7 @@ export const permissionDALFactory = (db: TDbClient) => {
updatedAt: membershipUpdatedAt,
orgId,
projectType,
shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem,
// just a prefilled value
orgAuthEnforced: false
}),
@@ -152,16 +152,28 @@ const escapeHandlebarsMissingMetadata = (obj: Record<string, string>) => {
// the new privilege management system is based on the actor having the appropriate permission to perform the privilege change,
// regardless of the actor's privilege level.
const validatePrivilegeChangeOperation = (
shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem: boolean,
opAction: OrgPermissionSet[0] | ProjectPermissionSet[0],
opSubject: OrgPermissionSet[1] | ProjectPermissionSet[1],
actorPermission: MongoAbility,
managedPermission: MongoAbility
) => {
// first we ensure if the actor has the permission to manage the privilege
if (actorPermission.can(opAction, opSubject)) {
if (shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem) {
if (actorPermission.can(opAction, opSubject)) {
return {
isValid: true,
missingPermissions: []
};
}
return {
isValid: true,
missingPermissions: []
isValid: false,
missingPermissions: [
{
action: opAction,
subject: opSubject
}
]
};
}
@@ -390,14 +390,18 @@ export const permissionServiceFactory = ({
const scopes = ServiceTokenScopes.parse(serviceToken.scopes || []);
return {
permission: buildServiceTokenProjectPermission(scopes, serviceToken.permissions),
membership: undefined
membership: {
shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem: true
}
};
};
type TProjectPermissionRT<T extends ActorType> = T extends ActorType.SERVICE
? {
permission: MongoAbility<ProjectPermissionSet, MongoQuery>;
membership: undefined;
membership: {
shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem: boolean;
};
hasRole: (arg: string) => boolean;
} // service token doesn't have both membership and roles
: {
@@ -406,6 +410,7 @@ export const permissionServiceFactory = ({
orgAuthEnforced: boolean | null | undefined;
orgId: string;
roles: Array<{ role: string }>;
shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem: boolean;
};
hasRole: (role: string) => boolean;
};
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ export const projectUserAdditionalPrivilegeServiceFactory = ({
actionProjectType: ActionProjectType.Any
});
ForbiddenError.from(permission).throwUnlessCan(ProjectPermissionMemberActions.Edit, ProjectPermissionSub.Member);
const { permission: targetUserPermission } = await permissionService.getProjectPermission({
const { permission: targetUserPermission, membership } = await permissionService.getProjectPermission({
actor: ActorType.USER,
actorId: projectMembership.userId,
projectId: projectMembership.projectId,
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ export const projectUserAdditionalPrivilegeServiceFactory = ({
// @ts-expect-error this is expected error because of one being really accurate rule definition other being a bit more broader. Both are valid casl rules
targetUserPermission.update(targetUserPermission.rules.concat(customPermission));
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
membership.shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem,
ProjectPermissionMemberActions.ManagePrivileges,
ProjectPermissionSub.Member,
permission,
@@ -155,7 +156,7 @@ export const projectUserAdditionalPrivilegeServiceFactory = ({
message: `Project membership for user with ID '${userPrivilege.userId}' not found in project with ID '${userPrivilege.projectId}'`
});
const { permission } = await permissionService.getProjectPermission({
const { permission, membership } = await permissionService.getProjectPermission({
actor,
actorId,
projectId: projectMembership.projectId,
@@ -177,6 +178,7 @@ export const projectUserAdditionalPrivilegeServiceFactory = ({
// @ts-expect-error this is expected error because of one being really accurate rule definition other being a bit more broader. Both are valid casl rules
targetUserPermission.update(targetUserPermission.rules.concat(dto.permissions || []));
const permissionBoundary = validatePrivilegeChangeOperation(
membership.shouldUseNewPrivilegeSystem,
ProjectPermissionMemberActions.ManagePrivileges,
ProjectPermissionSub.Member,
permission,